十面皇庭系列 78 - 工业法庭奇侠 – 18年告过26个老板 [The Industrial Court Saga Sued 26 bosses in 18 years]

1. 2019年，我们发表了关于一名雇员在过去15年告过22个老板的系列分享，并被网友称为传奇人物

2. 该员工被解雇的原因除了表现不佳和工作习惯不尽如人意之外，也包括没有达到雇用要求以及表现和行为不符合预期。

3. 而在后面的案件，在工作申请中提供虚假信息 [伪造 CV] 成为被解雇的主要原因。

4. 尽管该员工在起诉 Shock Media Studio Sdn Bhd 的案件中达成庭外和解，但工业法庭决定继续审理各方提交的文件和诉状，并公布其调查结果，同时也提醒雇主要注意 "简历欺诈 "或 "申请欺诈 "的风险。

5. 或许江山易改本性难移，尽管如此，此雇员似乎并没有安分过

6. 在起诉 ITZ My Treats Sdn Bhd 的案件（2021年第1128号裁决）中，工业法庭发现，这名连续被解雇的雇员，在17年内总共提交了26个案件，数量之多令人吃惊。

7. 工业法庭对证据进行了评估，工业法庭提出了以下意见作为补充：

👉 "虽然索赔人没有任何代表律师，但索赔人似乎很熟悉工业法庭的操作和程序，因为他在吉隆坡工业法庭一直是个熟悉的人。

👉 从提交的案件数量来看，工业法庭发现，终止索赔人就业的原因一直是他的表现不佳，工作态度不理想，不能满足工作要求，没有达到预期的表现标准和行为。

👉  虽然雇员以前在工业法庭的记录可能与新案件的指控没有直接关系，但工业法庭可以对该事实进行司法认知，并可以推断出该雇员的工作态度和可信度。

👉  索赔人似乎对在公司长期工作不感兴趣，只是在等待因他最清楚的原因而被终止雇用"。 ("（重点强调）。

8. 因此，工业法庭维持了公司解雇的决定【即：公司赢了这场官司】。

9. 他收手了吗？遗憾的是，似乎没有。

🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻

1. In 2019, we published a series of stories about 22 unfair dismissals brought by an employee against his former employer.

2. the reasons for dismissal included, in addition to poor performance and unsatisfactory work habits, failure to meet employment requirements, and performance and behaviour that did not meet expectations.

3. In the latter case, the provision of false information in the job application [falsified CV] was the main reason for dismissal.

4. Although the employee reached an out-of-court settlement in his case against Shock Media Studio Sdn. Bhd., the Industrial Court decided to continue to review the documents and pleadings submitted by the parties and to publish its findings, warning employers of the risk of "CV fraud" or "application fraud".

5. While it is true that it is difficult to change one's personality, the employee did not appear to have reached a comfortable place in his or her job.

6. The Industrial Court concluded that the employee in the case against ITZ My Treats Sdn Bhd (Award No. 1128 of 2021) had submitted an extraordinary total of 26 cases over a period of 17 years, during which he had been consistently dismissed. 

7. The evidence was assessed by the Industrial Court, which made the following additional observations.

👉  “Though the Claimant did not have any legal representation, the Claimant seems to be well acquainted with industrial court practice and procedure, as he has been a familiar face in the Kuala Lumpur Industrial Court.

👉  From the number of cases filed, the Court finds that the reason for the termination of the Claimant’s employment has always been his poor performance, unsatisfactory working attitude, inability to meet job requirements and not meeting expected performance standard and behavior.

👉  Although the previous records of an employee in the Industrial Court may not be directly relevant to the allegations in a new case, the court can take judicial notice of the fact and can infer about the employee’s working attitude and credibility.

👉  The Claimant seems not interested to work long in a Company and was just waiting to be terminated of his employment for reason best known to him.”  (emphasis added)

8. As a result, the Industrial Court upheld the company's decision to dismiss [i.e.: the company won the case].

9. Has he stopped yet? Sadly, it appears not.

🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳

👉 专业资讯送到你手中

1. 网站 ✍️ https://www.ccs-co.com/

2. Telegram ✍️ http://bit.ly/YourAuditor

3. Instagram ✍ http://tiny.cc/rojzrz

4. 部落格 ✍ https://lnkd.in/e-Pu8_G

5. Google ✍ https://lnkd.in/ehZE6mxy